Inmates moved without approval in Washington What happened next

Have you ever experienced an unexpected change, like being relocated without your approval? In Washington State, such legal issues are not uncommon, especially with authoritative decisions that appear to sidestep individual rights. Understanding the law is crucial to effectively handle these situations. Through the Matteson v. Washington Department of Corrections case, we’ll explore how a court ruling can provide a pathway to resolution.

Situation

Specific Situation

Imagine being in Washington State, where a group of people living in prison faced a big change. They were moved from their home prisons in Washington to a private prison far away in Colorado. This happened because the prisons in Washington were too crowded, and the Washington Department of Corrections (DOC) needed more space. The inmates didn’t agree with this move and decided to challenge it. They believed the Washington State Legislature did not give the DOC the right to send them to a different state. They also felt it was unfair because they didn’t get a chance to explain their side before being moved.

Plaintiff’s Argument

The inmates, including people named Michael Matteson, Russell Taylor, and Jason Hull, argued that the transfer wasn’t legal. They said the DOC didn’t have the proper permission from the Washington State Legislature to send them to Colorado. They wanted to be released from their sentences because they thought the state gave up control over them by moving them out of state. They also believed they should have had a chance to talk about this change before it happened, which they didn’t get.

Defendant’s Argument

The Washington Department of Corrections, on the other hand, said they did have the right to move the inmates. They explained that the laws allowed them to transfer inmates to other states if necessary, even before a new law in 1999 made it clearer. They also said the inmates could still challenge the move after it happened, so it wasn’t against the rules.

Judgment Outcome

The court decided that the Washington Department of Corrections was right. They said the DOC could move the inmates to Colorado because the law gave them the power to do so. The court also said the inmates’ rights weren’t violated because there was no need for a hearing before the transfer. So, the inmates’ request to be released was denied (Case No. 68310-7).

Resolution Methods

Immediate Actions

If you or someone you know is facing a similar situation, it’s important to take immediate action. First, understand the reasons behind the transfer. Is it due to overcrowding or other management issues? Knowing the reason can help in finding the right solution. Next, gather all the information about the transfer, including the legal basis and any notices received.

Filing a Petition

To challenge a transfer legally, you can file a Personal Restraint Petition (PRP). This is a legal document that argues why the transfer is incorrect or unfair. It’s essential to provide strong evidence and legal arguments. Consulting with a lawyer who understands prison law can make this process smoother. They can help draft the petition and ensure all legal points are covered.

Negotiation and Advocacy

Sometimes, talking directly with the Department of Corrections or advocating for legislative changes can be more effective than going to court. You can write letters or meet with officials to discuss concerns and possible solutions. Engaging lawmakers to review and possibly amend transfer laws can also help address the root of the issue.

FAQ

What is a Personal Restraint Petition (PRP)?

A Personal Restraint Petition (PRP) is a document that prisoners can use to challenge their detention or the conditions they face in prison. It’s like saying, “I think something’s wrong here, and I need the court to look into it.”

Why can inmates be transferred out-of-state?

The law allows for inmates to be moved to other states if it’s in the best interest of the state or the prisoners. This is usually done to deal with overcrowding or to provide better facilities.

Can inmates choose not to be transferred?

Inmates usually cannot say no to being transferred. They can challenge the move legally, but the Department of Corrections has the final say based on the law.

Is a hearing required before transferring inmates?

There is no need for a hearing before transferring inmates under current laws. They can appeal the decision afterwards if they believe it was wrong.

What role does the ACLU play in these cases?

The ACLU may offer additional perspectives on civil liberties through amicus briefs, which provide the court with more information, but they don’t directly represent the inmates in court.

What happens if prisons are overcrowded?

When prisons are overcrowded, transferring inmates to out-of-state facilities is one way to ensure safety and manage resources effectively.

Does transferring inmates affect state jurisdiction?

Even if inmates are moved to another state, they are still under the legal authority of the state that transferred them. The transfer doesn’t change the legal control the original state has over them.

Are there concerns with private prisons?

Yes, there are debates about using private prisons, but legally, states can contract with them to house inmates. This is allowed under current laws, despite varying opinions on the topic.